1. In John 16:12,13 we read, I have yet many things to say unto you,
but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when He, the Spirit of truth is
come, He will guide you into all truth . Does this refer to the
administration of the mystery?
In Eph 3:1-4 the
apostle Paul makes it clear that it was by a special administration of
the grace of God that he was the sole recipient of the gospel of the
mystery which he might give to the Gentiles. Down in verse 8 he speaks
of himself as less than the least of all saints, but that he should
make known the administration of the mystery. The 12 had a part in the
administration of promise. They are
to sit with Christ in the millennium and judge the nations of the earth
and
evangelize them. The Church of the mystery has no such mission. The 12
have
their names written in the foundations of the New Jerusalem which is to
be
here on the earth. There were things that the 12 could not bear to hear
at
that time, but which had reference to further truth in the
administration of promise. There was a perfection to be attained in
that administration as
well as in the other. They were to be given all the truth that they
would need to proclaim the coming of the King and His kingdom during
the period of the Acts.
2. Some claim that the term
Israel refers to the 10 tribes and that Jew refers to Judah (with
Benjamin and Levi). Is this true?
The Word of God makes
no such distinctions. This is another example of men bending the truth
to fit the lie. The 10 tribes were in Persia at the time of Esther, yet
in that book they are called Jews 6 times. Our Lord came to the lost
sheep of the house of Israel, according to His own words. But some
would have you believe that the 10 tribes were in Ireland at that time.
Did the Lord go to Ireland seeking them? Paul said he was a Jew (Acts
22:3) yet he was of the tribe of Benjamin. Our Lord Himself was a Jew
(John 4:9) while Nathaniel called Him the King of Israel (John 1:49).
If you use the concordance, you will find many more examples.
3. I still have a little
difficulty about the deity of Christ. Where does He come out and say
that He was God?
May I ask, Where did
the Lord ever come out and say that He was the Messiah of Israel? The
signs and the testimony were sufficient and those who could read the OT
and see the signs had all the testimony they needed. It is the same
with the deity of Christ. Every attribute of God is also attributed to
Him. So where is the difficulty? There is no lack of proof, but there
is a great lack of belief. That was also Israel's trouble. As for
Scripture references look at John 1:18, John 5:18-27, John 8:23-24,
John 10:30-38,
John 20:28, Eph 3:9 and there are many others.
4. If people do not really die,
then why did the Lord say, Because I
live, ye shall live also (John 14:19)?
It was not God that
said, Ye shall not surely die, but
Satan (Gen 3:4). All in Adam do die. Man's only hope for survival is in
resurrection. All in Christ will be made alive. He is the
first fruits of them that slept. No hope is given for those outside of
Christ.
5. Does the Holy Spirit indwell
the believer of this age, those in the administration of the mystery?
If so, why?
Yes. The Spirit Himself
beareth witness with our spirit (new nature within), that we are the
children of God. Although found in Romans 8:16 this statement is
undispensational, truth for all time. Verse 9 tells us that if we do
not have the spirit, the new nature, we are none of His. And verse 11
tells us that there is a quickening here and now in our bodies, in our
lives, that comes from this indwelling spirit. So it is this indwelling
Spirit that seals the believer (Eph 1:13) and it is this indwelling
Spirit that can be grieved (Eph 4:30). It is by this indwelling Spirit
that God can make The Church, the temple, which is the body of Christ,
His habitation (Eph 2:22). The vain and foolish philosophies of the
Gnostics of course would have no place for this doctrine.
6. What is this mystery in
Romans 16:25 which had been hid since the ages began?
This is not the mystery
that had been hid in God from ages and generations which you will find
in Colossians and Ephesians. The context of this verse reveals that it
is the mystery of Christ which Paul is preaching to the Romans. The
mystery of Christ began with the creation in Gen 1:1 of which we find
later He is the Creator. Eph 3:3-5 tells of the mystery of Christ. It
was known to the sons of men in past ages. But not as fully as when
Paul finishes the Word of God, the canon of Scripture, showing Christ
to be Head of The Church which is His body. Romans 16:26 tells that
this mystery of Christ is
manifested by the Scriptures of the prophets. Now the prophets of Eph
4:11
had not written Scriptures at this time of writing. A part of the
mystery of Christ is well set forth in Isaiah 53. In fact all the
Scriptures speak of Him and further reveal the mystery concerning Him.
And in Romans, Christ is brought out as a federal head in contrast to
Adam, showing that by Adam came sin and death, but the hope of
resurrection by Jesus Christ. So Romans 16:25 tells nothing about the
great secret or mystery which had been hid from
ages and generations in God that the Salvation of God is now sent to
the
Gentiles.
7. What is the gospel of the
grace of God in Acts 20:24?
It is the gospel of the
uncircumcision that we find mentioned in Acts 15 and also in Gal 2:7.
It is the good news that the Gentiles could become a
part of the congregation of Israel and partake of their blessings
(Romans 15:27) without being under the law. So in that early church the
Jew walked by law, the Gentile by grace.
8. What gospel must one preach
today lest he be accursed (Gal
1:9)?
No one can be accursed
today for preaching any so-called gospel. For one to be accursed, he
had to be subject to the law. Israel and the law are set aside today
and so no one has been accursed for about 1900 years. Where there is no
law, no sin can be imputed. We are under grace today.
9. Why at the end of the
prophecy of Jonah does it speak of over 120,000 children and then
mention much cattle? What can be the connection?
God definitely said by
the mouth of Jonah that He was going to destroy Nineveh in 40 days.
There were no conditions or if's about it. But the people,
including the king, believed God and they repented. So God in mercy and
kindness did not do what He said He was going to do. No one can find
fault with a judge
that will excuse one at the bar thru mercy. We have 2 other instances
of
like doing by the Almighty. Adam did not die the day he ate of the
fruit, and God did not destroy Israel and make a nation from Moses and
his family as He said He would. The sentence was lifted in mercy each
time. But there is something there to connect the children and the
cattle. In Ecc 3:19,20 we see that in dying there is no difference
between man and beast, and they go to the same place. But we also find
in Deut 8:3 that even though man was
barred from the tree of life, he can live by faith, by believing what
God
has said. These children were not yet old enough to believe unto life,
so
like the cattle they would have no resurrection.
10. What does repentance have
to do with salvation? What is it?
According to the usage
of the word, it means a change of mind, and that
for the better. We cannot read any more than that into the word. It
does
not occur in John's gospel which is the great salvation book for the
human
race today. But it is obvious that if a man believes, he has changed
his
mind from unbelief. However, the word repentance is used much more in
the
case of those who belong to God and rarely of those who do not believe.
It was Israel that was called to repent for the kingdom of heaven was
at
hand. Today this word has lost much of its original meaning and most
folks
think it means penance. But the word penance cannot be found anywhere
in
the Bible. It is not there.
11. Did Paul write any epistles
while in the prison at Caesarea?
There is no evidence
that he did. And there is strong evidence that he did not. When Paul's
testimony was not received at Jerusalem, the Lord said to him, Depart; for I will send thee far hence unto
the Gentiles. This cannot be said of Caesarea, for it was not
far from Jerusalem. Paul's ministry was in Asia, Europe, and ended at
Rome.
12. Can it be true„that God
will raise up the unbelievers in their original bodies, punish them,
and then destroy them?
Resurrection or raising
up these people would be an act of creation. Does God create sin or
sinners? Would that be according to His attributes? Furthermore why
should He punish them? They were slaves of sin and could not help
themselves. Also 2Cor 5:19 tells us that Christ died for their
sins and no trespasses are imputed. So there is no reason for
punishment. The question is just this; What part would this play in
redemption?
13. It says in 2Cor 5:18 that
all things are of God. Does this include sin and death and also Satan
himself?
In the verse before, it
says that old things have passed away for the believer and that all
things have become new. So all things that are of God are these new
things. Never neglect the context. If all things were unlimited, as
some suggest, then we can go back to Ecc 1:2 and prove that all things
are vanity. But in that case it is the human labors referred to in
verses 3-8 that are vanity. Always look for the antecedent.
14. What does the Bible say
about birth control?
Nothing, absolutely
nothing. There are some things written in 1Cor 7 which seem to pertain
to the subject, but it is in view of the coming tribulation and is in
keeping with what is revealed in Matt 24:19. After Acts 28:28 Paul
advised the younger widows to marry and no longer spoke of the coming
distress which was postponed.
15. How did the tradition get
started that the church began at Pentecost?
Rome said so. There is
no other evidence either historical or Biblical.
16. Some say that Paul never
proclaimed the kingdom of God, but preached only the mystery. What is
the evidence?
Paul was told first of
all by the risen Lord to preach the things which
he had seen (Acts 26:16). What he had seen was what the 12 and others
were
doing. So if Paul preached only the mystery, then we will have to say
the
same of the 12 and also of Stephen whom Paul heard. In Acts 17:7 the
men
of Thessalonica heard Paul preach and reported that he preached another
King
instead of Caesar. Evidently Paul was preaching the kingdom, the same
as
the 12, up to Acts 28:28.
17. Did not Paul begin a new
ministry when he turned to the Gentiles in Acts 13:46? Was not this the
beginning of the church?
If you read the next
verse you will find that Paul quotes from Isaiah 49:6 for his authority
to turn to the Gentiles. Then this was no mystery or secret hid from
ages and generations.
18. What was the purpose of the
ministry of Peter in the house of Cornelius?
We must note some
things that are not true in order to appreciate that which is true.
Nothing is said about Cornelius attending temple or synagogue. All we
know is that he was a centurion at the head of an Italian band of
soldiers
and that he was devout, feared God, gave alms to poor Jews, and prayed
to
God always. This sums up all we know about him. Even after his
experience
at the preaching of Peter there is nothing said about him, whether he
went
to the temple or synagogue or whether he ever joined with the band of
Christians
at Jerusalem or elsewhere. With that out of the way, we can see that
this
was a preparation for Paul and his ministry to Gentiles during the Acts
period
of time.
19. How shall I choose a church
or place of worship to attend?
In John 4 you will find
that this was also the question of the Samaritan woman. And what was
the answer? But the hour cometh, and
now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and
in truth; for the Father seeketh such to worship Him. So today
worship has no place designated, but the quality is stressed. It is to
be a true spiritual worship. What better place to start it than
in the home?
20. You have said that John was
preaching to Israel only. What proof do you have for saying that?
Acts 13:24.
21. What would be the condition
of our country if there had been no churches? Have they not been a
great force in keeping our civilization?
We have a great many
people today who have gotten all mixed up and they
equate civilization and salvation. There are many ministers today
dedicated
to the task of saving our society at any cost. We have the do-gooders
who
want to improve the world and the old nature of man so that he will
finally
reach the peak of evolution and become as God and be fit for heaven. It
is true that the churches have improved and preserved a moral tone of
our
civilization. But that does not save men. Billy Sunday once said,
"There
is no difference between the up-and-out and the down-and-out. They are
all
out." That is right. So we cannot say how many would have been saved
today
without the churches. Many are being saved in spite of them. We do not
know how much of the message of salvation would have been preserved in
the
families of our country if there had been no churches. We just cannot
answer
your question, for there is no way of knowing. Conditions might have
been
better or they might have been worse as far as true worship is
concerned. Speculation is useless.
22. What are the basic
differences between the kingdom and the church?
The kingdom is a part
of the promise made to Abraham and pertains primarily to Israel; but
The Church is made up of nations without any distinctions. The kingdom
will have a King; The Church has a Head. The kingdom is to be here on
the earth where David's kingdom was with Jerusalem as the great world
center; The Church has its place in the heavenlies. The kingdom has
laws; The Church walks by grace. In the kingdom there is a promise of a
bride; but
The Church is the body of Christ of which He is the Head. But there is
one
great common truth; all are saved by grace.
23. Is it true that the nation
Israel must repent before the Lord can set up His kingdom?
From the human
standpoint, Yes. For prophecy tells us that they will mourn and that
they will say blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. From
God's standpoint, the day cannot be hastened. He will come in the
fullness
of time.
24. It is said in Rev 1:7 that
when the Lord comes every eye shall see Him. Does this mean that all
people of all ages will be there to see?
This is a figure of
speech, synedoche, where a part is used for the person. Only those who
have eyes and can see with them when He comes will see Him.
Dead folks cannot see. And some living folks may be blind. They will
not see either. We have a similar figure in Ph’p 2:10 where at the name of Jesus every knee
shall bow, and every tongue confess that He is Lord. This points
to a time farther on than that in Revelation. But it will all be
voluntary and only the living and the resurrected will do it. No one
will be forced to bow. There are many other Scriptures in which this
figure can be found.
25. Is not Christ reigning as
King now in the heavens and will not this rule continue? How come some
say that he is coming down to earth again to Jerusalem and rule over
the nations here?
At the present time
Satan and his angels are in the heavens. They will be cast out in the
midst of the last week of the 70 weeks determined on Israel (Dan 9:24).
This is described in Rev 12:9. So it is patent
that
Christ is not supreme ruler in the heavens now, but rather that He is
hid
(Col 3:3), and that whenever Christ is manifested in the heavens the
members
of His church (not the bride) will be manifested with Him (Col 3:4):
That
is the hope of The Church of the administration of the mystery. But
Christ
will come and reign on the earth on the throne of His father, David. In
Acts
1:6 the apostles wanted to know if the kingdom was going to be set up
at
that time. Now since the kingdom is primarily of Israel and they are to
be
a blessing to the nations of the earth, how will the Lord and Israel
reign
over the earth as pictured in Psalms 2 if they are in heaven?
It
is wise to take what the Word says instead of trying to force some
private interpretation upon it, or change it.
26. Was the prophecy of Joel
fulfilled at Pentecost and the kingdom established there and then?
No, the prophecy has
not been fulfilled yet. At Pentecost the Spirit was not poured out upon
all flesh in Mt. Zion and Jerusalem. There were many Roman
soldiers that did not even know about it. There were no wonders in
heaven
and signs in the earth at that time. There was no change in the sun and
the moon. True, Peter spoke of it as the last days when these things
should
happen, but many years later John says that he is in the last days (1
John
2:18), and Peter many years later speaks of the last days as still
future
(2 Peter 3:3). At Pentecost Peter mentions the prophecy of Joel merely
to
show that what was working in the apostles was the same Spirit as Joel
spoke
about. Peter did not say that Joel's prophecy was being fulfilled. The
Lord's
house was not established (Isaiah 2) but was totally destroyed shortly
later. David's throne has not been occupied by Christ yet. No kingdom
was set
up and the apostles set on thrones.
27. What is a mortal sin?
It is a sin unto death
(1John 5:16). Under the law, murder was a sin unto death. In the case
of Ananias and Sapphira lying unto the Holy Spirit was a sin unto
death. In 1Cor 11:30 Paul speaks of some who sin and are sickly, and
some even died. That was a sin unto death. Mortal sin was never spoken
of a Gentile. It was to those under the law. Today the law is not in
effect, so we see no examples as above among Christians.
28. Should a Christian go to war?
When Jews who had hired
out as soldiers came to John at the Jordan, he baptized them, but never
told them to quit the army. Our Lord healed the son of a centurion,
but never told this man to quit warfare. Peter was in the house of
Cornelius,
but there is no record that he told Cornelius to leave the army. No
Scripture
can be quoted for either side, except that we are to be subject to the
powers
that be. One who is in the will of the Lord and trusts Him, will have
no
difficulty with the question. The Lord will put him where he wants him,
whether
it be on the battle front or in some peaceful occupation. Such
questions
as this are from the fearful and unbelieving.
29. Can Satan leave hell and
wander on the earth at will?
There is no Scripture
that says or even hints that Satan was ever in hell or ever will be. At
the present time he is just where he has always been from the time of
his creation. Some day he will be cast down from that position in
heaven to the earth with no power to ascend to heaven again. Hell is
for
those who are made of the dust of the earth. Satan is not such a
creature.
30. What about men taking upon
themselves the title of Reverend?
This word occurs in
Scripture just once, Psalms 111:9. It is used of the name of God. It is
blasphemous for man to take to himself that which pertains to God and
His holy name.
31. Did our Lord wear long hair
when here on the earth among men?
No. Unless a man were a
Nazarite, it was a shame for him to have long hair (1Cor 11:14). Our
Lord was not a Nazarite, for a Nazarite was not permitted to drink
wine, and our Lord did.
32. Can a Christian become
wealthy?
There is no reason why
he cannot. Of course those who take the story or
parable of the rich man and Lazarus as literal, make it mandatory that
one
has to get rid of all personal property and beg if he is to be saved.
But
there is no premium on poverty in God's Word. Abraham was wealthy and
was
a friend of God. David was wealthy and he was a man after God's own
heart. Isaac and Jacob both were wealthy. Solomon had much wealth. And
Joseph who
buried the Lord was reputed to be the wealthiest Jew of the time.
Wealth
can be a curse, and it can be a blessing. But poverty can make a man
steal.
We have wealthy men today who have contributed much to the spread of
the
gospel.
33. I hear that you teach that
there are two churches instead
of one. Is this true?
Why not read what we
write and see for yourself? From time to time we have written about the
7 churches in Asia. We have recognized that there was a church in the
wilderness (Acts 7:38). We have taken note of the fact that the Lord
was going to build His church on a rock (Matt 16:18). And besides these
were the churches at Rome, Corinth, and many other places to which
Paul addressed letters. But it is noteworthy that after Acts 28:28 the
word
church is never in the plural and it is The Church, not A church. And
every
church is a body. So today there is one body (Eph 4:4), One Church.
34. According to 1Cor 16:1
should there be a collection taken
up in the meeting each Sunday?
There is one collection
only in this passage. It is for the saints at Jerusalem. These saints
were believing Jews. This one collection was to be taken up on
the first of the weeks. The word day is not in the Greek. This is the
first
week after the Passover. Paul would then take up this collection and
carry
it with him to Jerusalem.
35. What is this resurrection in
Php 3:11?
The out resurrection
from among the dead is the prize of the high calling and is for those
who have remained faithful and suffered like unto the suffering of
Jesus Christ. Paul is saying he is not sure if he will attain to it so
as to show it is a prize for believers that suffer and remain faithful
to the end and to contrast it with other hopes and resurrections taught
by the apostle. In Hebrews 11 he does speak of some who attained to a
better resurrection. But they were of a different administration. It is
not the resurrection that
is the result of believing and obtaining everlasting life. For that is
by
faith, and not by attainment. By 2 Timothy Paul is confident of
attaining the prize and also knows his life shall soon end by the hands
of his captors.
36. I have heard, life defined
as union with Christ and death
as separation from Christ. Does this fit the Scriptures?
Try it for yourself.
Read Romans 6:1-10 and use these definitions for life and death. Does
this fit?
37. I notice that in the
records of the baptism of our Lord in Jordan, that it says that He came
up out of the water. Does this mean that He was immersed in the water?
Not necessarily. A
river flows, as a usual thing in a bed, for water seeks the lowest
level possible. So to get into the river it was necessary to go down
into the water and to get out, meant going up out of the water.
38. Who are the other sheep of
John 10:16?
The word other is allos
which means others of the same kind. Since Israel are the sheep and
these are of the same kind, they cannot be Gentiles. That fold ceased
to exist at Acts 28:28. There is no fold now. But God will deal with
Israel again some day and then there will be another fold and other
sheep,
not the same ones of this fold in John 10. The present era is between
the
folds. For, other references to these sheep, see Matt 22:9,10 and
24:31. Are
not these all the same?
39. How is it that you teach
Pauline doctrine, but do not advocate the Lord's table (1Cor 10 &
1l)?
We do not teach Pauline
doctrine for the simple reason that there is no
such thing. Paul preached 4 separate gospels during his ministry. In
1Cor
10 and 11 Paul is writing to Jewish believers whose fathers had crossed
the
Red Sea (10:1). And the feast he is talking about is the Passover which
was
observed in the homes, not in public. This feast was a supper, observed
in
the evening, never at morning or noon. These 2 chapters cannot be used
for
a proof text in support of the observance of the heathen Baal's supper
which
had been taken up by Christendom.
40. I wonder why that Satan is
usually pictured as a black man with horns, hooves, and a tail, when it
says in 2Cor 11:14 that he is transformed into an angel of light. What
did he look like when he appeared in the garden to Eve?
The popular conception
of Satan is really a picture of Nimrod, the great rebel of Babylon. It
is told in the legends that he killed a wild bull of extraordinary
strength and fierceness. He is supposed to have taken the horns of the
bull and made himself a headdress. It did not take the artists long to
add the hooves and the tail (always pointed as a spear) and you have
the concept of Nimrod the great hunter of his fellow men. We are told
in Ezekiel 28 that Satan was created as a covering cherub and when he
appeared to Eve it was as the Nachash (shining one). So to Eve he did
appear as a great and shining angel, one to revere and believe. No
snake deceived Eve.
41. Why do you persist in using
the King James version when there are so many modern ones that are more
easily understood and which do not use
obsolete words?
There are a number of
reasons for retaining the Authorized Version. Many concordances would
be useless, there would be difficulty with lexicons and the like for
they are mostly founded on the AV. It is a sample of the best English
of the past centuries. And no modern version can express the holiness
and majesty of God as it does. It presents no difficulties to those who
have
been brought up in Christian homes where the Bible was read and prayers
made. Neither does it present any difficulties to one who knows God.
But the
Bible will remain a closed book to the ungodly no difference what
version it may be in. We are very suspicious of versions, for all too
often they reflect
some man's private belief which may be partial unbelief. None yet has
surpassed
the Authorized Version which also has the benefit of putting many words
in
italics where there were no corresponding Greek or Hebrew word in the
original
manuscripts. It is also one of the earliest English translations and
although
not perfect does contain less license to private doctrines and added
words.
42. Who should keep the Passover?
All circumcised
Israelites. It was to be eaten in the home. There was to be no leaven
in the house. No manner of work was to be done on the day it was
observed. Do not forget that this is all about the kingdom and not The
Church. The children of the household were to ask why it was observed
and the master of the house recited the story of the exodus from Egypt.
The law never made any provisions for any uncircumcised to observe it.
See Ex 12:47-49. It was in force till the end of Acts, where The Church
began.
43. Should I put something into
the collection plate when 1 go to a church?
Most certainly, yes,
unless you are the type of person that would slip under the side of the
circus tent to avoid paying admission. If you go for the show,
then pay your share. Jonah paid his fare, even when running from the
Lord
(Jonah 1:3).
44. What is the meaning of Gal
2:20? How can one be dead and
yet alive?
Christ is our life, we
have no eternal life of ourselves. Christ is our
supply. Holding Him we have nourishment ministered. This is the fact
concerning
ourselves as His own, a fact we are required to acknowledge against the
background of our own death. He has accomplished for us our death to
the end that He may now abide in us. The one has first to happen before
the other can be. This is the meaning of the words: I have been crucified with Christ; yet I
live; and yet no longer I, but Christ liveth in me (Gal 2:20).
But for an acknowledgment that we, as to our human life, are mortal we
can never believe that we are accounted to have died with
Christ. Those of our fellow-brethren who hold that the soul of man is
immortal
may use the term that they died with Christ - but they cannot in
actuality
believe that they did die. They cannot envisage the truth that, as to
their
human life, they are accounted to have ceased to be.
45. Paul expected to be among
the living at the rapture (1Thes 4:15-17; 1Cor 15:51,52). Is this
rapture still Paul's hope, even though he died and will be among the
dead believers of that time?
The rapture is only for
the children of promise, primarily Jews but also Gentiles who became
the children of Abraham by faith from Acts 10 to Acts 28:28. It has to
do with the kingdom here on the earth. The rapture is just a little
trip up into the air (not heaven) to meet the Lord as He comes with
clouds of angels who will execute judgment as He sets up His kingdom
seated on the throne of David in Jerusalem. Since the husbandman is to
be the first partaker of the fruits, then Paul must surely have a part
in the administration of the mystery which was entrusted to him to
proclaim. Therefore he will have
an earlier resurrection than that at the coming of the Lord and will be
manifested
with Him in the heavenly places.
46. Matthew 8:11 seems to
indicate that Gentiles from the East and the West will have a part in
the kingdom, but not from the North and the
South. Is there any explanation for this?
There is no explanation
that we can give at this time except the suggestion that it may be that
the Russians and the Egyptians will not have a part in it. That could
also include Lebanon and Syria. But this is only a guess. These
nations might be all changed around by that time. But it is something
to
think about. The Word is exact and there is good reason for these words
being
written. The prophecies will be plain to all when fulfilled.
47. If the 70 weeks of Daniel 9
begins at the dedication of the temple, 1 always thought it had its
beginning with the decree of Artaxerxes or Astyages in 454 B.C. Can you
explain your position?
Very briefly, you will
find 2 distinct prophecies in Daniel chapter 9. The first one is in
verse 24 and speaks of the second advent of the Messiah. Note
that 70 weeks are determined upon the people and the city. This cannot
begin
with the decree for the simple reason that the people are not in the
city
till about 49 years (7 weeks) later. So the 70 weeks determined on the
city
and the people must begin about the time of the dedication of the
temple or
405 B.C. It is not hard then to figure that the coming of the Messiah
to
set up His kingdom would have been AD. 85. However the course of the
city
and the people did not run to this end, but the people were set aside
at
Acts 28:28 and since then have not been a people. The city was
destroyed in
70 AD. Now if the people were cut off at the end of Acts, about A.D.
63, then
there are about 3 weeks yet to run till the coming of the Messiah. We
do
not know when this prophecy will be resumed. Now the 7 and 62 weeks
after the going forth of the decree brings us to A.D. 29, the date when
Messiah was cut off. That has been completed.
48. Does Genesis 6:3 indicate
that God will not always strive
with men,. but that one can cross a deadline where there will be no
more
conviction by the Holy Spirit and they are forever lost?
Man, in this verse is
Adam in the Hebrew: The verse means that God is getting weary of
striving with Adam, for Adam (like others) is erring. See note in
Companion Bible. So Adam is given another 120 years to live and he died
at the age of 930. So we can take it that Adam was 810 years old when
God finally made up His mind not to put up with him.
49. Is there any escape from
hell once one is in it? If so, how?
The common notion of
hell is far from what the Word says that it is. It
is sheol in the Hebrew and occurs 65 times in the OT. It is translated
hell 31 times, grave 31 times and pit 3 times. The RV is consistent in
that it renders it sheol each time. It could be translated grave all 65
times and not mar the meaning. In the NT hades is used 11 times. It is
also used in the LXX to translate sheol. So it is the same thing. It is
translated 10 times
as hell and once as grave. Gehenna does not enter into this discussion,
for
although it is translated hell, it is the city dump outside of
Jerusalem. Neither does Tartarus enter in either. The grave or hell is
a place where people are dead and live not again till resurrection (Rev
20:5). Our Lord was in hell 3 days and 3 nites. He came out by
resurrection and was the first
fruits of the great harvest that is still to come forth. Death and hell
are to be destroyed (Rev 20:13,14). So all go to hell or the grave at
death. Those who have everlasting life will escape by resurrection.
50. What is the difference
between the gospel of the kingdom and the gospel of the grace of God?
The former includes the
latter in one sense. The gospel or good news of the kingdom was first
proclaimed by John the Baptist, the Lord Himself, then the 12, and
finally the 70, this being before the death of Christ. Then the
apostles were further instructed as to the kingdom and this was the
gospel preached by all up to Acts 28:28. The gospel of the grace of God
began in the house of Cornelius, about 9 years after Pentecost. This
was the only instance
that Peter preached this gospel. None of the other 11 preached it at
any
time. And about 17 years after Pentecost Paul began to preach the
gospel
of the grace of God at Antioch to the Gentiles (just as Peter did) and
continued
it till the end of Acts. But in every instance Paul was careful to
preach
the gospel of the kingdom to the Jew first, and then turned to the
Gentiles
and preached to them the gospel of the grace of God, which meant that
they
could partake of all the spiritual blessings of Israel without keeping
the
law (being circumcised, keeping feasts, and the rituals). The same
salvation
(not eternal life) of the kingdom was at that time for both Jew and
Gentile,
but to the Jew first.
51. What is the preaching of
Jesus Christ according to the revelation of the mystery (Romans 16:25)?
In this context we
learn that the mystery that is in view is one that had been hushed
since the ages began. So it is not the administration of the mystery
which was hid from ages and generations and had its plans made before
the
ages began. This mystery, that had been hushed had been made known by
the
prophets as the context tells us, so it is not the mystery of Ephesians
and
Colossians. Also this mystery in Romans is made known to all nations
for
the obedience of faith. In the structure outline of Romans this is
explained by the same words appearing in 1:1-5. It is the preaching of
Jesus Christ as the Son of God, but connected with His being the seed
of David. So then this is kingdom preaching and declares Jesus Christ
not only the anointed one or Messiah, but truly the Son of God.
52. In what sense, if any, did
works ever save?
Basically we have all
through the Bible record the revelation of life as the gift of God,
received by faith and in no connection whatsoever with works. But on
that life we find based at least two salvations or lines of blessing.
One is the promise made to Abraham. At least the kingdom aspect of the
administration of promise has much to do with works as the sermon on
the mount will indicate. Also Mark 16:16 adds that when the kingdom was
being preached to Jews only, they must believe and be baptized in order
to be saved. From 1Cor 3 we may infer that good works of themselves did
not save, but could be burned up and
the worker saved as by fire. When works were connected with salvation,
they
were for the most part specific rather than general. But today we have
a
salvation revealed in Eph 2:8-10 which is obtained by faith only. This
salvation is a creation unto good works, not of works.
53. I am puzzled by Mark 13:32.
Does this take away from the truth of the deity of Christ?
This passage says, But of that day and hour knoweth no man,
no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son,
but the Father. This has been a favorite verse for those who
deny
the deity of Christ. But it may be that it does prove His deity. He
knows
that no man knows the day and the hour. He knows that the angels in
heaven
do not know the day and the hour. Does not this knowledge indicate
deity?
And what if He does not choose to know? Deity can forget or remember at
will. He can forget our sins. That we cannot do. If the Lord chose not
to
know the time, then that was His business and we have no right to
question Him.
54. Is glory a place?
If at any time it
answers the question, Where?, then it is a place. Whenever the question
of place comes up with any terms, this is a good question to ask. If it
designates where something is to be or to happen, then it is a
place. But you will note when you look up the word glory in the
concordance that it is not always used the same. It may speak of the
glory of God. It
may speak of the glory of Christ. And there are other usages. In the
mystery
of godliness in 1Timothy 3:16 it says that He was received up into
glory.
This answers the question of Where?, and is definitely a place. You may
try
other passages with the same method.
55. What is dispensational truth?
It is the body of
truth, doctrine and practice, that is for a particular household of
God. Some dispensational truth may be common to both dispensations.
Some truth may be peculiar to its own particular dispensation. For
instance, citizenship in the heavenly places is peculiar to the
dispensation of the mystery. On the other hand, a part in the new
Jerusalem is peculiar to the dispensation of promise. The word chosen
is common to both, but time of
choosing makes the distinction. The choice of some is before the
overthrow,
and the choice of others since the overthrow. This is where the
workmanship
of right division comes in.
56. What is meant by falling
from grace?
You probably refer to
Gal 5:4. In the first place this epistle to the Galatians is
written to the members of the administration of promise, and especially
to the Gentile members who had been grafted into the blessings of
Israel and the kingdom. To these Paul had preached the gospel of the
grace of God, that they might receive all the benefits of the
administration of the promise without being circumcised and keeping the
law. But there were Judaizers who were convincing some of these
Gentiles that they must be circumcised and keep the law. So Paul says
to them, For I testify again to
every man (Gentile) that is circumcised, that he
is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ is become of no effect unto
you,
whosoever of you (Gentiles) are justified by the law; ye are fallen
from
grace. So to fall from grace was to leave the grace principle or
gospel and go back to circumcision.
57. Was the crossing of the Red
Sea literal, or was it just a
figurative story?
If it was just a story,
then we fail to see the point. If it was just a
story, then how did the few million Hebrew slaves get out of Egypt?
58. What does it mean to be
baptized with the Holy Ghost? Acts 1:4,5.
At Pentecost the
apostles were baptized with the Holy Ghost in fulfillment of the
promise in Luke 24: 49. They received power from on high. This power
enabled them to speak in languages and perform many miracles. This was
in connection with those who proclaimed the kingdom. It was not in any
way connected
with The Church. See The Giver and His Gifts by E. W. Bullinger for
further
light.
59. Can Gentiles partake of the
New Covenant?
Jer 31:31 plainly
states that the New Covenant is to be made with the house of Israel and
the house of Judah. This is again quoted in Heb 8:8. This is with
Israel, not The Church or the Gentiles. The Gentiles do have a promise
(Eph 3:6; 2Tim 1:1; Tit 1:2). But Gentiles have always been strangers
from the covenants of promise (Eph 2:12).
60. In Acts 20:27 Paul declares
that he has shown the whole counsel of God, yet we are led to believe
that the mystery which was later proclaimed had been hid from ages and
generations and that Paul did not know it there in Acts 20. How can we
reconcile these?
If you will look at Eph
1:9 and 11 you will see two words used which do
not mean the same thing. One is counsel, and the other is purpose. Paul
did
not say that he had proclaimed the whole purpose of God, but God's
counsel
(in accordance with the purpose then revealed). But when a new purpose
or
further purpose was made known, then there was a counsel or working out
of
that purpose as you see in Ephesians one. Be careful with terms.
61. What are the gates of hell
in Matthew 16:18?
Since no explanation is
given in that place, we must then go back to the OT which the disciples
at that time had. In Isaiah 38:10 we read, I shall go to the gates of the grave. Have
the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors
of the shadow of death? (Job 38:17). Thou that liftest me up from the gates of
death (Psalms 9:13). Can this be resurrection from the grave?
And we read in Psalms 107: 18, And they draw near unto the gates of
death. Now going back to the passage in Matthew, we must conclude that
the doors of the grave or hell cannot hold His church when He calls.
They will come forth from the state of death.
62. If being born again in John
3:3 means resurrection, then what does it mean in 1Peter 1:23?
The same word is not
used in these two passages. The latter means begotten (See margin in
Companion Bible). So we must conclude that there can be no rebirth or
resurrection without a begetting by the Word of God. Try using begotten
in John 3:6 and see what the meaning is. Further study is needed in
this subject.
63. Is it true that "ALL Paul's
early epistles are addressed to Gentiles." References, such as Romans
11:13; 1Cor 12:2; Gal 4:8; and 1Thess 2:14, are given to prove the
point. Can you give more light on this?
There is little doubt
that Paul's first epistle was Galatians. And it appears that it was
written to the Gentile Christians of Galatia. But at the same time it
is evident that he wrote Hebrews, and that epistle is not to Gentiles
at all! Romans 2 is to the Jewish believers, verse 17 emphasizing it.
Chapters 10 and 11 of 1Cor are to those whose fathers crossed the Red
Sea. Surely they must have been Jews. The fathers of the Gentiles never
crossed the Red Sea. You will note in these chapters the directions for
keeping the feast (the Passover) which was never lawful for Gentiles to
keep.
64. Must the Roman empire be
revived?
For many years we have
heard this debated, but really have never yet found a Scripture which
would indicate that this must be true. We are open to any proof anyone
may offer for this, but we are afraid it is merely a tradition someone
started.
65. How can every knee bow
confessing Christ Lord, to God's glory, unless reconciled? (Philippians
2: 10,11).
Lest any be misled, we
must emphasize the fact that reconciliation is not life nor is it
salvation. The definition is given in 2Cor 5:19. It means that
a work was accomplished so that the sins of the world are not imputed
against
it. This is good news for those who do not have life, for it gives them
access
to God to receive the precious gift of everlasting life. Those that
have
this life shall live. And in resurrection, they will be given knees
which
they can bow, and be given tongues with which they can confess. But
those
who do not have life and will never see life (John 3:36), but remain in
the
dust of the earth, will never have knees or tongues.
66. What does it mean in
Philippians 2:12 where it says we are to work out our salvation with
fear and trembling?
It is well to consider
what salvation is before making any applications. It does not say that
we are to work out our everlasting life. To equate salvation
and everlasting life will only get us into confusion. And somebody has
said
that confusion is ignorance. When our Lord said to the woman of Samaria
that
salvation was of the Jews, He was not talking about everlasting life.
By
faith the Samaritans or any other people could have life. Peter
recognized
this fact in Acts 10:43. Israel had a salvation to work out. It was
that
they were to be a priestly nation and make known to the nations the
name
of Jehovah. They were promised the blessings of the kingdom. To them
pertained
the preaching of the kingdom. All this was their salvation and they
were
expected to work it out. And so when the salvation of God was sent to
the
Gentiles in Acts 28:28, it does not mean that they are then to obtain
everlasting
life. Their salvation was the administration of the mystery with all
its
hopes and blessings. This they were to work out.
67. What is the meaning of
1Timothy 1:8?
This verse states that
the law is good if one uses it lawfully. There is law today, but not in
the sense of the Mosaic law given at Sinai, although that law did
reveal the righteousness of God and man's utter inability to attain
unto such a state of holiness. But the law or will of God is given to
us in the last seven epistles of Paul in the form of exhortations and
the
like. This is a good thing for us providing we do not attempt to use it
as
a means of boasting in the flesh. We can walk worthy of our vocation or
calling,
but there is nothing to brag about, for such a walk is where Christ
lives
in and acts thru us.
68. What is the difference
between eternal life and everlasting life?
They both translate the
same phrase in the Greek. However God alone can
have eternal life for He has no beginning or end. His children do have
a
beginning and are given everlasting life through the works of
His Son.
69. Your teaching seems very
queer. How can Christ be King of
kings on the earth and at the same time be Head of a church which is
His
body in heaven? This is absurd, is it not?
For finite beings such
as you and I, this would be impossible and therefore absurd. But if
Christ were deity, God manifest in flesh, then He is the Infinite and
could appear in as many different places and forms as He might choose.
70. Was Christ a soul after the
resurrection?
Psalms 16:10 says, Thou wilt not leave My soul in hell;
neither wilt Thou suffer Thine Holy One to see corruption. This
is quoted in Acts 2:27 by Peter, and part of it is quoted
in Acts 13:35 by Paul. Christ went to hell just as have all others who
have
lived and died on this earth. But His soul was holy and so did not see
corruption.
It was raised from the dead. If He was a soul before death, then He was
a
soul in resurrection.
71. I have heard it said that
God is acting in grace today to
all the world, and that if He does not act in grace, He does not act at
all. Is this according to the Scriptures?
In theory, this is but
another version of universal reconciliation or salvation. It just
happens that the Redeemer in the Hebrew is also the Avenger. The
redemption of Noah and his family brought vengeance on the wicked world
of that time. The redemption of Israel from Egypt brought vengeance on
Pharaoh and his hosts. The very fact that God loves His people makes
Him hate their enemies. We are told that Buddha loves everybody. He
sits and does nothing about it. But that is not our God. His grace is
for those that will partake of it. His wrath abides on others (John
3:36).
72. I am a little mixed up. It
speaks of the inheritance of God in the heavenlies in Ephesians 1:18,
and in Colossians 1:12 it says that we
are made meet to be partakers of the inheritance in the holiest in
light. However Ephesians 5:5 indicates that one may lose this
inheritance. How is this?
The Church has an
inheritance, even as did Israel. Individuals may lose
it, even as many thousands of Israel lost their inheritance.
73. In Psalms 1:5 it says that
the ungodly would not stand (arise) in the judgment, and that this
meant no resurrection for the unbelievers. Somebody said that this word
stand did not mean resurrection. Can you answer
this?
A lot of people are
quick to set forth their own ideas as gospel truth,
but err, not knowing the Scriptures. You will find this word quwm
(koom)
on page 1101 of the Englishman's Hebrew Concordance. There is a long
list
of the places where used, but one or two will suffice. See Job 14:12;
Psalms
88:10; Isaiah 26:14. You can also check this with Strong's concordance.
The
word number is 6965. This is what Scripture says.
74. Do you believe in the verbal
inspiration of the Bible? If
so, then how would you translate sheep and vine and the like for people
who
know nothing of these things? After all, is not the Bible just the
words
of men?
The Bible time after
time claims to be the Word of God. If it is not, then it is false and
should be thrown out altogether. It would even be dangerous if it were
just the words of men. But look at Psalms 12: 6, The words of the Lord are pure words: as
silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. God
has spoken in man's language to man, but He does not use those words
carelessly as man does. And the fact that some might not understand
some of the terms used is no excuse to make any changes in the Word of
God. How many understand love? How many comprehend the term
righteousness? We who are teachers have to teach what these things are.
And so it is up to a man to teach what a sheep or a vine is when
speaking to the
Eskimos. Some tribes do not know what a home is. It is up to Christians
to
teach and to show these what a home is. We must not tamper with the
Scriptures. But we must remember that All Scripture is given by
inspiration of God and is profitable...
75. What is the sin mentioned in
Hebrews 12:1?
It is the sin of
unbelief. That is the root of all other sins. Self-will nourishes it.
76. It seems strange that Rahab
the harlot should be so well spoken of in the Bible. Why?
In this day when men
think that respectability is Christianity, this does pose a real
question. But Rahab was saved by faith and not by any moral qualities
she may have had. So we can say that she was a sinner saved by grace.
People who do not know the love and power of God cannot understand His
works. Our Lord was criticized because He kept company with publicans
and sinners. God is able to take the worst sinner living today and make
a saint of him. But men with all their do-good programs and reformation
cannot do this.
77. Why don't we hear more about
Jobs wife?
She was not much good
as a wife. When Job was in trouble and grief, she
was no comfort. All she had to say was that he should curse God and
commit
suicide (Job 2:9). God did not see fit even to put her name in
Scripture.
The same with Lot's wife.
78. Why did God have a program
of healing in the apostolic times and not have it today?
During the time covered
by Acts, the kingdom was still at hand. If any at that time would
have been careful to study Daniel 9, they would
have been able to set the date of the Lord's second coming and the
setting
up of His kingdom. It would have been A.D. 85, just 490 years from the
dedication of the temple after the exile (405 B.C.). With that near
coming at hand, it
would be fitting that those who believed and entered into the kingdom
would
be alive and ready to meet the King at His coming. So the sick were
healed
and the dead raised during the time that the kingdom was in view. But
when
the kingdom was postponed at Acts 28:28, the gifts of the Spirit
ceased. The two days of Hosea 6:2 must intervene before Israel will be
raised and
come into their kingdom. Resurrection and being manifested with Him in
the
heavenlies is the hope of the members of The Church which is His body
today. A resurrection at about the time of the great white throne of
judgment is
the hope of those who have everlasting life, but no adoption (See Job
14:12
and compare with Rev 20:11). Thus we can see that there is no gifts of
healing
and the like today.
79. How about the common
teaching that the church is Spiritual Israel? Is it true?
I am afraid that we
will never be able to find the expression Spiritual
Israel in the Bible. It is not there. History tells us that this
expression
originated with a man by the name of Origines. He was a Greek writer
and
teacher of the third century. It was a theory that God was forever thru
with the Jew and now all the blessings and covenants had been
transferred
to the church. A few years later the Emperor Constantine saw in this a
great
chance to improve his position as ruler. This would make a fine basis
for
a church-state, making war in the name of and with the aid of religion,
for
ritual, pomp, splendor, and ecclesiastical theatricals. We have on hand
today the tragic results of that lie, that theory, which has caused to
much
bloodshed and misery in centuries past. And if we are not careful,
organized
religion will again take over and rule the world. Then there will be
great
tribulation.
80. Is water baptism essential
for the remission of sins?
Isaiah had a coal of
fire laid upon his mouth, which in touching his lips took away all his
iniquity and purged all his sins. Our Lord spoke to many during His
earthly ministry, remitting their sins without baptism. The members of
The Church of the administration of The Mystery are not under law, and
they today have redemption through His blood, and the forgiveness of
sins. They have only one baptism and this is explained in Col 2:12,13
as being identified
with Christ in His death, burial and resurrection, even to a quickening
with
Him with the accompaniment of forgiveness of sins. No water baptism is
mentioned
in connection with The Church. It is a part of the law and the kingdom
of
Israel. But there are even now those who claim that they are Jews (Rev
2:9;
3:9)
81. It would seem that Romans
2:14 proves that man did not have a fall, but by nature does the things
of the law. How do you see it?
The epistle to the
Romans has suffered much at the hands of its friends, the commentators
and the expositors. It is a case of being very careful to
read the address on the envelope, to find out to whom the apostle is
speaking. This epistle is written to the church at Rome which was made
up of Jewish and Gentile believers. The man spoken to in verse 1 of
chapter 2 is seen to be the Jew (see verse 17). When we read Galatians
we see that the Gentile believers in the churches were not subject to
the law of Israel. This is also brought out in the council at Jerusalem
(Acts 15). So here in Romans 2:14 Paul is reminding the Jewish
believers that the Gentile believers did by nature (the new nature in
the believer) the things contained in the law. This would only be
natural, for the law did contain the righteous requirements of God for
His people. This does not say that the Gentiles observed the ritual
of the law. That was settled in Acts 15:24-29.
82. There is a great deal of
mention of the book of life in the Revelation. There seems to be a
danger of being blotted out of it. How can one know his name is in this
book?
This is another example
of carelessly reading the Word. The book of life is mentioned about 7
times in the Revelation. Once it is called the Lamb's book of life
(21:27). This might give us a clue. But the best explanation for it is
given in Daniel 12:1. The names written in the book are those of
Daniel's people, that is, Israel. So we do not look for the names of
Gentiles
to be written in that particular book. The Revelation is about Israel,
their
tribulation, and the overcomers. It is possible that there might be a
book
for the Gentiles, but you will find that elsewhere.
83. Do we today have need of the
Advocate mentioned in 1John 2:1?
Under the law, men were
judged by the law (Romans 2:12) and those that do not have the law
cannot be judged by it. Where there is no law, sin is not imputed and
therefore there can be no summons to court or a charge made against the
sinner (see 2Cor 5:19 and Romans 5:13). Those under the law prayed that
they might be forgiven as they forgave others. But we who are under
grace are to forgive others freely because we have been forgiven (Eph
4:32). We have no need of an Advocate today, for we have forgiveness of
sins (Eph 1:7 & Col 1:14).
84. What was the spiritual
condition of the rich young ruler when he came to the Lord and asked
what he should do to inherit eternal life?
This young man who must
have been a "somewhat" in the synagogue was already a believer. He
recognized the Lord as the Messiah, the King of Israel. His
request was what he must do to have a place of importance in the
kingdom. The reply of the Lord was very similar to His words in Matt
19:29. It meant the forsaking of everything in the world for His name's
sake. The price
was too high for this man.
85. Did Paul continue
establishing churches or assemblies after Acts 28:28?
There is no record that
he did. Neither is there any record that such churches or assemblies
were in existence after Acts 28:28.
86. What part, or parts, of the
gospel of John are truth for this administration?
In the first place, we
do not use the term "this administration." If the administration of The
Mystery is meant, then John's gospel is not to or for it. But John's
gospel is truth for today. So many are misled by the expression "this
administration," thinking it means this age or time in which we live
and that it means a way in which God is dealing with mankind today in
general. God does have a special way of dealing with the administration
of The Mystery, a church already seated in heavenly places. But for the
rest of humanity today, John's gospel applies (John 3:16). There is no
administration teaching for today in this gospel. That which applies
today and which is for Gentiles (the Jews have been set aside, 1:11),
is 1:1-18; 3:13-21; and 3:31-36. The reason for the writing of the
gospel is given in 20:30,31. There are some short explanations through
the book for Gentile readers, and then the last 2 verses of the book
are up-to-date.
87. Should those who are
Christians gather together at some place for worship today?
It may be that the word
worship is somewhat overdone these days. Even in Israel, the temple was
the designated place of worship. The Synagogue was not a place of
worship, but a place to teach the Scriptures and also as a court where
men might be tried under the law and penalties meted out. Paul knew
this very well, for he had been beaten in the Synagogues many times. In
the epistles written after Acts 28:28 the word worship occurs just
once. That is in Ph'p 3:3 where Paul says, For we are the (true) circumcision, which
worship God in the spirit. This is an echo of John 4:23 where
the
Lord said to the woman of Samaria,
But
the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshiper shall worship the
Father
in spirit and in truth. That worship has nothing to do with a
place,
a priesthood, nor a ritual. It is natural for those who love the Word
and
the One of whom it speaks to gather together, but we have no such
command
today. Leaders often wish it and even pretend it so they can get a
following
and a big collection.
88. Do you believe that there
are 2 bodies?
In the administration
of The Mystery there is 1 Body (Eph 4:4). In the
administration of promise there was 1 body (1Co 12:13). Whether that
included
all believers I cannot tell. It may have been just the church at
Corinth. So there was one body, and there is one body. But they are not
the same. The first was of Israel with an earthly hope. There is one
now of Gentiles
already seated in heavenly places. The first was to minister to the
nations
of the earth. There is one now making known the manifold wisdom of God
to
principalities and powers in heavenly places. We are aware that most of
Christendom does not know much about right division and the mystery.
89. I am curious about Acts
17:11. What was it that Paul told
the Bereans, and what Scriptures might they have looked up to see if it
was
so?
You have done well to
stop and ask such a question. Not many have done
that. In the same chapter, in verses 2 and 3, you will find what Paul
preached; And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them (the synagogue
of the Jews), and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the
Scriptures, opening and
alleging, that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from
the
dead; and that this Jesus-whom I preach unto you, is Christ. So it is
clear
that Paul was preaching and arguing from the Scriptures that Jesus of
Nazareth
was indeed their Christ and Messiah, the King of Israel. In verse 7 his
enemies charge him with saying, that there is another king (than
Caesar),
one Jesus. The theme of their Scriptures, the OT, is of the coming
kingdom
and the King. And this is what the Bereans found. Paul was not
preaching
the administration of The Mystery. Even if he had, they could not have
verified
his message from the Scriptures they had, for it was a subject that had
been
hid in God from ages and generations (Eph 3:9; Col 1:26). Be sure to
check
this.
90. How can we know that the
"voice" in Isaiah 40:3 refers to
John the Baptist?
The Holy Spirit
inspired Matthew to write of John the Baptist, For this is He that was spoken of by the
prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness,
Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make His paths straight. This
is quoted from the reference you gave. Also
you will find that a messenger is to be sent to proclaim the coming of
the
Lord, the God of Israel (Mal 2:16,17; 3:1-4). This is the same Lord and
God referred to in your text. Not only does John the Baptist fulfill
the
place of the messenger, but Jesus of Nazareth is the Lord and the God
of
Israel whose way is to be made straight. Christ is Jehovah.
91. Could it be that Philippians
2:9-11 refers to the man, Jesus, who is another creature or a god?
In this reference it is
plainly stated that the highest name possible is given to Jesus of
Nazareth. That name is found in Psalms 7:17, the first of 36 places it
occurs in the OT. It is
Jehovah-Elyon, or, Jehovah
the
Most High God. There is no name above this one. If Jesus of
Nazareth
was not Jehovah, the Most High God, then our Bible is wrong, not
inspired,
and can not be trusted. We might just as well throw it out and lean on
our
own understanding. Here is a further quotation from Isaiah 45:23, I am God, and there is none else. I have
sworn by Myself, the word is gone out of My mouth in righteousness, and
shall not return, That unto Me every knee shall bow, and every tongue
shall swear. In this same context it is made plain that there
is no other Savior. However Satan still is saying, Yea, hath God
said! We find our directions made clear in 2 John 9,10, Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth
not in the doctrine of Christ (what the Word testifies of Him)
, hath not God ...If there come any unto you, and bring not this
doctrine,
receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed. Just
remember,
the greatest of sins is unbelief.
92. What is the meaning of
Romans 9:6 where it says, " For they
are not all Israel, which are of Israel." Does this have to do
with the true seed?
The true and the false
seed are not in this context. Rather, the downfall of Israel and the
blessing of the Gentile believers is the subject of chapters 9-11 here
in Romans. Paul is making it plain that the true Israel of God is not
all made up of the descendants of Israel, but also includes Gentiles.
In his first epistle, Paul said to the Gentile believers, And if ye be Christ's, then are ye
Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise (Gal 3:29).
In verse 9 of the same chapter we read, So then they which be of faith are blessed
with faithful Abraham. Now keep in mind that this is in the
administration of promise, not The Mystery. Israel is still first.
93. Did John the Baptist have a
message and a baptism for Gentiles?
There is no record that
he did. In fact, there was no ministry to Gentiles in the NT until the
day that Peter went to the house of Cornelius in the city
of Caesarea (Acts 10 entire).
94. There is much talk these
days about Moses being married to a black woman, and also that Philip
preached to a colored man of Ethiopia. Do these have any bearing on
truth for today?
None that I can think
of. Zipporah was the wife of Moses. She was the
daughter of a priest in Midian. His name was Reuel, Raguel, or Jethro.
The
Midianites were children of Abraham by his second wife, Keturah, and so
would
be the same race and color as Moses. Since Midian was in Arabia, a part
of
the land of Cush, she would be a Cushite by nationality, but a
Midianite
by race. So what? The eunuch, to whom Philip spoke, is not. said to be
an Ethiopian, but from Ethiopia. He had the Scriptures and had been to
Jerusalem
to worship. So we must conclude that he was a Jew that was a slave in
high
position with the queen of Ethiopia. This would correspond with the
condition
of Daniel in the court of Nebuchanezzar and later in the court of
Darius
the Mede. I might add that the queen of Sheba was very probably not of
Ethiopia,
as tradition says, but queen Hatshepsut of Egypt (Sheba meaning south).
95. What is meant by the evil
day in Ephesians 6:13?
There is a chance that
at some time during the truth of the administration of The Mystery
there may come a time of tribulation or trial upon those who dare to
speak this truth. The spiritual failure and barrenness we see in
Christendom
today can well lead to such a condition.
96. Are we to approach the
throne of grace in prayer today as indicated in Hebrews 4:16?
The word throne does
not appear in any of the epistles Paul wrote after
Acts 28:28. It is not found in the gospel of John which was also
written
this side of Acts. Throne has to do with a King and a kingdom. There is
no place for a throne in The Church. In the plural, it occurs in Col
1:16,
but it is concerning thrones, dominions, and the like in heaven and
earth,
not the throne of God.
97. In Romans 6:14,15 it speaks
of not being under the law, but under grace. Was not the Jew still
under the law then?
Yes, the Jew was still
under the ceremonial law, known as the law. But
in the reference you gave, there is no article. Under faith, love, and
grace, the Jew was no longer subject to the moral law. The moral law is
contained in the last 5 of the 10 commandments. You can readily see
that if one loves his neighbor as himself, then this moral law is made
void. It is rather a
strange thing to say that law is for the lawless. But that is right.
The
Gentile believers in Rome had the new nature and so did the things of
the
law, even though they never had it (Romans 2:14). Romans 13:8,10 shows
that
love is the fulfilling of the law (the moral law).
98. According to Ephesians 3:2
is not this the age or administration of grace?
No. This verse tells us
that a special administration of grace was given to Paul that he might
preach the gospel of the administration of The Mystery. Just notice how
Paul follows this statement up in verses 7 & 8. Compare with Col
1:25 where he speaks of his ministry being an administration of
God to him. The next verse speaks of this ministry as The Mystery.
99. When did water baptism cease
to be the rule for God's people?
The apostles and Paul
baptized with water in the Acts era. Paul makes it known that after
Acts 28:28 there is one baptism (Eph 4:5) and in Col 2:12 this baptism
is described as being identified with Christ in death, burial and
resurrection. So we must conclude that water baptism ceased at the end
of Acts.
100. Is it true that two
distinct purposes of God are revealed in the Bible?
Yes that is true. (1)
There is a distinctive purpose revealed concerning Israel, the kingdom,
and the earth program (not connected with powers in the
heavens). The kingdom phase culminates in the coming of the King, the
rapture
of His people, Israel, and the setting up of the kingdom. (2) There is
another
distinctive purpose revealed after Acts 28:28 which has to do with the
Gentiles
(nations) and this in connection with heavenly places and heavenly
beings. This is The Church. All believers outside these two distinctive
purposes
from Adam till now will have their part with the dying malefactor in
paradise
(the new earth). This groups all believers into 3 groups, but with 2
spheres
of blessing, the earth and the heavens.